|
With over 25 years of experience specializing
in severe to extremely complex cases, it is only on occasion that I have a chance to
work with a client who is highly active and strongly independent. The project for
Alyssa's Swing, for example, presented with many technical challenges but resulted
in a product that fulfilled a need beyond the traditional sitting environment.
Creating a seating system for Amy, however, presented challenges stemming from an
entirely different set of goals and perspectives.
Christy Malonzo, a private practice therapist from Huntington Beach, CA,
had already meet with Amy regarding issues relating to low back and shoulder pain and had
also discussed complications relating to her multitude of failed mobility bases and seating
components. It seems that none of the systems were built to Amy's functional requirements
and were in fact exacerbating her physical discomforts. So, Christy made a few calls and
assembled a team of experts.
I first met with Amy at Christy's office along with Tom and Paul from Pro-Med. We
looked at three of the five mobility systems she had received over the past twelve years and
discovered that although she was not happy with it, she preferred using the third oldest of
the five. Furthermore, the newest one (not even a year old) was just sitting in her home along
with the others, taking up valuable space. After 90 minutes of discussions and note taking the
team decided to take a reverse approach to finding the perfect solution; build a seating system
to the satisfaction of Amy and then design a wheelchair around the seating system. This solution
came in part from the dealer's perspective that if the seating specialist couldn't position Amy
to both her liking and physical needs then it made no sense to build yet another wheelchair.
Our next meeting took place at my office so that no time restrictions
would be placed on finding Amy's preferred posture and optimal functional
alignment. The meeting concluded with the creation of a body mold;
using a vacuum bag seating simulator. Creating and aligning a body
mold for a person who independently propels their wheelchair is
an entirely different process than that for a person who uses a
powered w/c or is dependant upon other for propulsion. So, in this
part of the assignment, Amy controlled the entire impression capturing
process. This approach allowed Amy to demonstrate what was bad about
the other systems and articulate what she was ultimately trying
to achieve. The process also highlights the old adage for seating
specialists, "I might be the expert at making seating systems, but
the consumer is the expert at living in them." Once she was totally
content the mold was set.
Next came the fabrication process, trial fitting and finally,
with all thumbs up, the recording of tailored specifications for Amy's new
wheelchair. As for the new wheelchair, that part of the project was monitored
with the assistance of Ernie from Colours as the new frame was also slatted
to be the debut of a brand new design concept from the manufacturer dubbed the "Razorblade."
Its uniqueness comes from the compound bend at the seat rail and leg hanger
union and the single teardrop extrusion weld for the front casters.
The fabrication process for the seating system was in no way typical
because this was not simply a full-body foam-only seating system.
For this project the backrest was designed to fill just the asymmetrical
voids created by Amy's extensive spinal deformity and the seat cushion
consisted of only enough material to support her pelvic obliquity
and provide relief for her downward
protruding left trochanter. The overall shape of the
system was
intended to have an "organic" feel to it, which in this case meant
no wood or plastic base and no suspension hardware; just the bare
essentials.
At the trial fitting Amy indicated right away that the
backrest relieved the stress and pain associated with her
spinal deformity and the seat provided more stability and
pressure relief than the previous gel cushion. Still,
she was able to identify two improvements; remove foam
from the right perimeter of the backrest to allow for
greater arm movement and secondly, add in a bit more
contact support over the relief for the downward protruding
trochanter. The chronic shoulder pain would be addressed by
the new wheelchair specifications which would allow for easier
and more efficient stroke movement, transfers and equipment transport.
It wasn't until the delivery that Amy had her first
opportunity to try out the full configuration of the
new seating system and wheelchair. As usual, and
after a few adjustments, we had her go through some
trial maneuvers to ensure that everything operated
as intended. Her reactions were both immediate and
tremendously

positive. The most significant difference she noticed
was that the energy from each stroke was transferring
directly into the wheels whereas before that same
energy was defused through the lack of spinal and
shoulder support. More importantly, she felt that
through the course of the project she was finally
able to provided considerable input in creating a
product that addressed her specific needs. The
biggest compliment for the group was Amy's request
that we do a similar redesign for the driver's seat
of her van.
Foam-only seating systems can be built for many
purposes. We've used this technique to fabricate positioning
aids for use inside vehicles, school chairs and other support
surfaces. We also custom fabricate many foam-only seats for
wheelchairs which already include a seat pan. In every case
the goal has been to provide maximum lightweight support and
stability in a posture of optimal functional alignment.
For the consumer who self propels there is a tremendous
weight reduction advantage with a foam-only seating
system when compared to a rigid design which must be
mounted with suspension hardware. This weight
reduction can translate in significant savings
of physical energy both during self propelled mobility
and in efforts to disassemble the system for transport.
Amy's system weighed less than three pounds when installed
and she performs independent transfers to the driver's seat of her van.
You might ask why we don't use foam-in-place or foam-in-box
techniques to produce such products. No doubt that we could
have completed the project in less time using these techniques
but I'm a strong believer in reproducibility. From my prospective,
if you can't replicate the finished product then neither the
technique nor the process can be taught or tested. The problem
with FIP is that you cannot regulate foam density or selectively
amend density at sites of your choosing. With FIB you can
exercise many more controls to conform the shape but still can't
selectively amend nor regulate foam density.
Richard Xavier Cushmaster
CUSHMAKER.com
©Copyright February 1, 2007
Return to Articles page.
Collaborators:
Tom Ell
Rehab Sales
Pro-med
Cypress, CA
Ernie Espinoza
National Sales Manager
Colours Wheelchair
800.892.8998
Christy Malonzo, MPT
Physical Therapist
Huntington Beach, CA
Paul
Pro-med
|