Home

Amy's Quest
A Minimalist Approach to Custom Seating


With over 25 years of experience specializing in severe to extremely complex cases, it is only on occasion that I have a chance to work with a client who is highly active and strongly independent. The project for Alyssa's Swing, for example, presented with many technical challenges but resulted in a product that fulfilled a need beyond the traditional sitting environment. Creating a seating system for Amy, however, presented challenges stemming from an entirely different set of goals and perspectives.

Christy Malonzo, a private practice therapist from Huntington Beach, CA, had already meet with Amy regarding issues relating to low back and shoulder pain and had also discussed complications relating to her multitude of failed mobility bases and seating components. It seems that none of the systems were built to Amy's functional requirements and were in fact exacerbating her physical discomforts. So, Christy made a few calls and assembled a team of experts.

I first met with Amy at Christy's office along with Tom and Paul from Pro-Med. We looked at three of the five mobility systems she had received over the past twelve years and discovered that although she was not happy with it, she preferred using the third oldest of the five. Furthermore, the newest one (not even a year old) was just sitting in her home along with the others, taking up valuable space. After 90 minutes of discussions and note taking the team decided to take a reverse approach to finding the perfect solution; build a seating system to the satisfaction of Amy and then design a wheelchair around the seating system. This solution came in part from the dealer's perspective that if the seating specialist couldn't position Amy to both her liking and physical needs then it made no sense to build yet another wheelchair.

Our next meeting took place at my office so that no time restrictions would be placed on finding Amy's preferred posture and optimal functional alignment. The meeting concluded with the creation of a body mold; using a vacuum bag seating simulator. Creating and aligning a body mold for a person who independently propels their wheelchair is an entirely different process than that for a person who uses a powered w/c or is dependant upon other for propulsion. So, in this part of the assignment, Amy controlled the entire impression capturing process. This approach allowed Amy to demonstrate what was bad about the other systems and articulate what she was ultimately trying to achieve. The process also highlights the old adage for seating specialists, "I might be the expert at making seating systems, but the consumer is the expert at living in them." Once she was totally content the mold was set.

Next came the fabrication process, trial fitting and finally, with all thumbs up, the recording of tailored specifications for Amy's new wheelchair. As for the new wheelchair, that part of the project was monitored with the assistance of Ernie from Colours as the new frame was also slatted to be the debut of a brand new design concept from the manufacturer dubbed the "Razorblade." Its uniqueness comes from the compound bend at the seat rail and leg hanger union and the single teardrop extrusion weld for the front casters.

The fabrication process for the seating system was in no way typical because this was not simply a full-body foam-only seating system. For this project the backrest was designed to fill just the asymmetrical voids created by Amy's extensive spinal deformity and the seat cushion consisted of only enough material to support her pelvic obliquity and provide relief for her downward protruding left trochanter. The overall shape of the system was intended to have an "organic" feel to it, which in this case meant no wood or plastic base and no suspension hardware; just the bare essentials.

At the trial fitting Amy indicated right away that the backrest relieved the stress and pain associated with her spinal deformity and the seat provided more stability and pressure relief than the previous gel cushion. Still, she was able to identify two improvements; remove foam from the right perimeter of the backrest to allow for greater arm movement and secondly, add in a bit more contact support over the relief for the downward protruding trochanter. The chronic shoulder pain would be addressed by the new wheelchair specifications which would allow for easier and more efficient stroke movement, transfers and equipment transport.

It wasn't until the delivery that Amy had her first opportunity to try out the full configuration of the new seating system and wheelchair. As usual, and after a few adjustments, we had her go through some trial maneuvers to ensure that everything operated as intended. Her reactions were both immediate and tremendously
positive. The most significant difference she noticed was that the energy from each stroke was transferring directly into the wheels whereas before that same energy was defused through the lack of spinal and shoulder support. More importantly, she felt that through the course of the project she was finally able to provided considerable input in creating a product that addressed her specific needs. The biggest compliment for the group was Amy's request that we do a similar redesign for the driver's seat of her van.


Foam-only seating systems can be built for many purposes. We've used this technique to fabricate positioning aids for use inside vehicles, school chairs and other support surfaces. We also custom fabricate many foam-only seats for wheelchairs which already include a seat pan. In every case the goal has been to provide maximum lightweight support and stability in a posture of optimal functional alignment.

For the consumer who self propels there is a tremendous weight reduction advantage with a foam-only seating system when compared to a rigid design which must be mounted with suspension hardware. This weight reduction can translate in significant savings of physical energy both during self propelled mobility and in efforts to disassemble the system for transport. Amy's system weighed less than three pounds when installed and she performs independent transfers to the driver's seat of her van.

You might ask why we don't use foam-in-place or foam-in-box techniques to produce such products. No doubt that we could have completed the project in less time using these techniques but I'm a strong believer in reproducibility. From my prospective, if you can't replicate the finished product then neither the technique nor the process can be taught or tested. The problem with FIP is that you cannot regulate foam density or selectively amend density at sites of your choosing. With FIB you can exercise many more controls to conform the shape but still can't selectively amend nor regulate foam density.


Richard Xavier Cushmaster
CUSHMAKER.com


©Copyright February 1, 2007



Return to Articles page.

Collaborators:
Tom Ell
Rehab Sales
Pro-med
Cypress, CA

Ernie Espinoza
National Sales Manager
Colours Wheelchair
800.892.8998

Christy Malonzo, MPT
Physical Therapist
Huntington Beach, CA

Paul
Pro-med